By Mary McComish, WA Today, 5th August 2019
Under the Victorian law, the two assessing doctors (in WA it may involve a doctor and a nurse practitioner) have to assess and certify as to around a dozen eligibility criteria and other things.
For example was the person a resident in Victoria, did the person have decision-making capacity (not compromised by depression or other mental health condition), was the person acting voluntarily and without coercion, did the person suffer from a disease, illness or medical condition, was it expected to cause death within six months, was it causing intolerable suffering?
… Any of these assessments or acts could be open to question, especially things like prognosis, capacity and absence of coercion in the decision.
Answering the questions could well involve extensive bedside interviews in the presence of opposing lawyers.Read the full article here.
The legal implications of legalising euthanasia are much more complex than people think, as seen in Victoria, Western Australia. Many different variables and assessments are open to question, coercion and error.
Surely it is better to support and resource our health professionals instead of turning to such a problematic and inherently dangerous piece of legislation?
Once this path is taken, there will be no going back.